Carlin Economics and Science

Applications of economics and science for rational public policy by Alan Carlin
  • rss
  • Home
  • About
  • Publications
    • An Evaluation of U.S. Government Aid to India, June 1964
    • Environmentally Responsible Energy Pricing, 1993
    • The United States Experience with Economic Incentives to Control Environmental Pollution 1992
    • Environmental Investments, The Cost of a Clean Environment, A Summary, 1990
    • Environmental Investments, Cost of a Clean Environment, Report by the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency to the Congress of the United States, 1991
    • Implementation and Utilization of Geoengineering for Global Climate Change Control, 2007
    • Mr. Udall’s Analysis, An Unrepentant Rejoinder
    • Risky Gamble
    • Vehicle Safety, Why the Market Did Not Encourage It and How It Might be Made to Do So, 1968
    • Why a Different Approach Is Required if Global Climate Change Is to Be Controlled Efficiently or Even at All
  • Added Sources

Environmentally Responsible Energy Pricing, 1993

Abstract

This paper summarizes a larger research report that explores the full social costs of different energy uses and their implications for pricing the environmental externalities associated with conventional environmental pollution, such as that from lead, particulates, SOX, and ozone to inform the greenhouse warming policy debate. The social costs developed are those implied by a “no regrets” approach to greenhouse warming. The social costs implied often greatly exceed current tax amounts. The midpoint estimates suggest that the price of coal is most out of line with its full social costs. According to the analysis, natural gas is currently overtaxed, and gasoline is appropriately taxed. There is also a substantial range of uncertainty embodied in the no regrets approach.

An earlier version of this paper can be downloaded from here.

Comments rss
Comments rss
Trackback
Trackback

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Recent Posts

  • July 22 May Well Mark the End for Major U.S. Climate Legislation and Global “Climate Control”
  • Why Congress Should Reject Preferences for Particular Fuel Sources as Well as Cap and Trade/tax
  • First Congressional Test of EPA’s Endangerment Finding Expected June 10
  • EPA: The Administration’s High Risk but Pivotal Climate Gamble
  • Why Peer Review Is No Substitute for the Scientific Method
  • Phil Jones May Still Have Some More Reflecting To Do
  • Why the Whole AGW/Warmist Narrative Is Even Weaker than Its Components
  • How EPA Seeks to Unilaterally Impose GHG Emission Regulations Using UN “Science” Whether Anyone Likes It or Not
  • The Politicization of EPA: The Administration’s Radical Endangerment Gamble
  • Climategate and EPA

Search

Archive

Recent Comments

  • Wiley Ebrani on Why Congress Should Reject Preferences for Particular Fuel Sources as Well as Cap and Trade/tax
  • Jesus Arentz on Comments on Proposed EPA Endangerment Technical Support Document
  • Democrat on July 22 May Well Mark the End for Major U.S. Climate Legislation and Global “Climate Control”
rss Comments rss valid xhtml 1.1 design by jide powered by Wordpress get firefox