Carlin Economics and Science

Applications of economics and science for rational public policy by Alan Carlin
  • rss
  • Home
  • About
  • Publications
    • An Evaluation of U.S. Government Aid to India, June 1964
    • Environmentally Responsible Energy Pricing, 1993
    • The United States Experience with Economic Incentives to Control Environmental Pollution 1992
    • Environmental Investments, The Cost of a Clean Environment, A Summary, 1990
    • Environmental Investments, Cost of a Clean Environment, Report by the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency to the Congress of the United States, 1991
    • Implementation and Utilization of Geoengineering for Global Climate Change Control, 2007
    • Mr. Udall’s Analysis, An Unrepentant Rejoinder
    • Risky Gamble
    • Vehicle Safety, Why the Market Did Not Encourage It and How It Might be Made to Do So, 1968
    • Why a Different Approach Is Required if Global Climate Change Is to Be Controlled Efficiently or Even at All
  • Added Sources

Environmental Investments, Cost of a Clean Environment, Report by the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency to the Congress of the United States, 1991

Abstract

Full report summarizing the direct costs of public and private pollution control activities in the United States. Presents data on environmental pollution control costs during the period 1972-1987, projects these costs for each subsequent year to the year 2000 under a number of assumptions, and breaks them down in a variety of ways. These ways include differentiating among capital, operating, and annualized costs, as well as the medium where the pollution is controlled, the economic sector (e.g., public, private) from which the control is funded, and whether the costs result from new or existing regulations. Cost estimates for five categories of environmental media (air, land, water, chemical, and multi-media) over the years 1972-2000 for each public sector and the private sector are included.

Full text

Comments rss
Comments rss
Trackback
Trackback

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Recent Posts

  • Phil Jones May Still Have Some More Reflecting To Do
  • Why the Whole AGW/Warmist Narrative Is Even Weaker than Its Components
  • How EPA Seeks to Unilaterally Impose GHG Emission Regulations Using UN “Science” Whether Anyone Likes It or Not
  • The Politicization of EPA: The Administration’s Radical Endangerment Gamble
  • Climategate and EPA
  • Why the Choice of Energy Sources Should Be Left to the Market after Externalities Are Taken into Account
  • Why the Basic Ground-measured Global Temperature Data Presented by AGW Supporters Is Suspect
  • Why the UN GHG Hypothesis Should Be Rejected on Scientific Grounds
  • Global Temperature Charts Suggest Implausibility of UN CO2 Hypothesis
  • How Skepticism Concerning the UN Hypothesis Fits with Interest in Geoengineering

Search

Archive

Recent Comments

  • Phil Pumphery on Why the Whole AGW/Warmist Narrative Is Even Weaker than Its Components
  • Danuta Moorefield on Why the Basic Ground-measured Global Temperature Data Presented by AGW Supporters Is Suspect
  • Haigha on How Skepticism Concerning the UN Hypothesis Fits with Interest in Geoengineering
rss Comments rss valid xhtml 1.1 design by jide powered by Wordpress get firefox