Carlin Economics and Science

Applications of economics and science for rational public policy by Alan Carlin
  • rss
  • Home
  • About
  • Publications
    • An Evaluation of U.S. Government Aid to India, June 1964
    • Environmentally Responsible Energy Pricing, 1993
    • The United States Experience with Economic Incentives to Control Environmental Pollution 1992
    • Environmental Investments, The Cost of a Clean Environment, A Summary, 1990
    • Environmental Investments, Cost of a Clean Environment, Report by the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency to the Congress of the United States, 1991
    • Implementation and Utilization of Geoengineering for Global Climate Change Control, 2007
    • Mr. Udall’s Analysis, An Unrepentant Rejoinder
    • Risky Gamble
    • Vehicle Safety, Why the Market Did Not Encourage It and How It Might be Made to Do So, 1968
    • Why a Different Approach Is Required if Global Climate Change Is to Be Controlled Efficiently or Even at All
  • Added Sources

How Skepticism Concerning the UN Hypothesis Fits with Interest in Geoengineering

Alan Carlin | July 22, 2009

Some may have wondered how I reconcile my skepticism about the United Nations hypothesis that emissions of CO2 and other greenhouse gases have an important effect on global temperatures fits with my interest in stratospheric geoengineering as an attractive alternative to reductions in CO2 emissions? This interest is shown in four of my previous publications in climate science under publications. If there is no real risk of a significant global temperature rise due to CO2, we may not need geoengineering after all. My view is that we still have much to learn about Earth’s climate and that the history of interglacial periods suggest that we could be faced with global cooling within a few thousand years. It would therefore appear prudent to be prepared for the eventuality that significant global warming or cooling could occur.

For reasons explained in my geoengineering papers, CO2 emissions control is unlikely to be effective in controlling global warming and useless for global cooling. For a comparatively modest cost, however, we could acquire the capability to carry out stratospheric geoengineering. Chances are very good that it would not be advisable to actually use it, but acquiring the capability would appear to be a wise precaution. It might also reassure those who believe in the UN hypothesis that possible potential warming could be stopped if there should ever be agreement that something needed to be done.

So in summary, I believe that significant global warming is unlikely this century, particularly as a result of increasing CO2 levels, but if it should start to occur it might be useful to be prepared to deal with such warming or the slightly more likely global cooling if necessary through stratospheric geoengineering. One other advantage of being prepared to use effective geoengineering techniques is that we would no longer have any need to undertake extremely expensive efforts to reduce CO2 emissions on the chance that there might be damaging global temperature increases or other adverse effects until the effects actually started to occur.

Comments
3 Comments »
Categories
Geoengineering
Comments rss Comments rss
Trackback Trackback

Recent Posts

  • July 22 May Well Mark the End for Major U.S. Climate Legislation and Global “Climate Control”
  • Why Congress Should Reject Preferences for Particular Fuel Sources as Well as Cap and Trade/tax
  • First Congressional Test of EPA’s Endangerment Finding Expected June 10
  • EPA: The Administration’s High Risk but Pivotal Climate Gamble
  • Why Peer Review Is No Substitute for the Scientific Method
  • Phil Jones May Still Have Some More Reflecting To Do
  • Why the Whole AGW/Warmist Narrative Is Even Weaker than Its Components
  • How EPA Seeks to Unilaterally Impose GHG Emission Regulations Using UN “Science” Whether Anyone Likes It or Not
  • The Politicization of EPA: The Administration’s Radical Endangerment Gamble
  • Climategate and EPA

Search

Archive

Recent Comments

  • Wiley Ebrani on Why Congress Should Reject Preferences for Particular Fuel Sources as Well as Cap and Trade/tax
  • Jesus Arentz on Comments on Proposed EPA Endangerment Technical Support Document
  • Democrat on July 22 May Well Mark the End for Major U.S. Climate Legislation and Global “Climate Control”
rss Comments rss valid xhtml 1.1 design by jide powered by Wordpress get firefox