Comments on: How EPA Seeks to Unilaterally Impose GHG Emission Regulations Using UN “Science” Whether Anyone Likes It or Not

By: Shayari

Shayari — Fri, 16 Jul 2010 09:36:05 +0000

I do Believe that other webmaster’s need to start thinking like you. I really like the way you care for your vistors. Its appears like you have everything from an great writer to an nice webmaster.I will like to follow you in twitter. You should really start a website where you should give individual coaching to student’s like me. Superb Value For Time spent on your blog.

By: Million

Million — Sun, 23 May 2010 02:24:29 +0000

Easily, the article is really the freshest on this worthy topic. I fit in with your conclusions and will eagerly look forward to your incoming updates. Just saying thanks will not just be sufficient, for the phenomenal lucidity in your writing. I will right away grab your rss feed to stay abreast of any updates. Fabulous work and much success in your business efforts!

By: Macie Verrecchia

Macie Verrecchia — Fri, 14 May 2010 01:31:09 +0000

Very good article. I recently discovered your blog and wished to say that we have really enjoyed reading your opinions. Any way I’ll be subscribing in your feed and I really hope you post again soon.

By: florida adjuster

florida adjuster — Sun, 14 Mar 2010 21:20:47 +0000

Funny part is that the Republican party was formed to FREE the slaves (which the Democrats opposed). Martin Luther King was a Republican. And now they have their own ‘Coffee Party” full of children of the rich and people (of all colors) are ready to fall at their feet. By the way, do you know the difference between the Republican and Democrat parties? Republicans are rich greedy company owners who never worked a day in their lives and Democrats are the children of the rich greedy company owners that are still rebelling against their rich greedy Republican parents. And until Mommy and Daddy stop taking care of them, they will continue to do so. The worse part about it is, the hard working Americans are the ones stuck in the middle because somebody has to work so the money can keep rolling in. Oh, that’s right, Clinton (another poor little rich boy) sent all the good jobs overseas when he signed NAFTA so all the rich, greedy, company owners could pay kids 50 cents a day in sweat shops. (It’s legal over there)

By: auto insurance

auto insurance — Wed, 10 Mar 2010 02:01:52 +0000

The problem with this country is BOTH the Democrats and Republicans. Anyone who seriously thinks that one side isn’t corrupt or slaves to Corporate America hasn’t done an adequate job of paying attention. To the Republicans: The GW administration will go down in History as one of the worst administrations. They eroded your constitutional rights, expanded the power of the wealthy elite, invaded countries under false pretenses, destroyed diplomatic relations with the rest of the world, and spent money like it was going out of style. To the Democrats: Obama is a dud. He promised much and has turned out to be another corporate lackey. He made deals with big pharma to ensure you could not get your medication cheaper elsewhere, he flip flopped on military tribunals, he refuses to fix health care properly through nationalization or single payer, he populates his inner circle with more Wall Street insiders, he spends money on bailouts and useless stimulus packages.

By: health insurance quotes

health insurance quotes — Wed, 17 Feb 2010 17:02:06 +0000

The Democrats don’t create jobs The Republicans don’t create jobs The government doesn’t create jobs The PRIVATE SECTOR creates jobs. The only thing the first three have to do Is LOWER TAXES

By: Artimus

Artimus — Mon, 15 Feb 2010 23:57:22 +0000

I think it’s pretty clear at this point that there will be a significant legal challenge to the EPA endangerment finding. Only the Congress can legislate policy and the EPA finding attempts by their own admission to circumvent this. With the momentum building it is doubtful the EPA will get past summary judgment.

By: JAE

JAE — Wed, 10 Feb 2010 19:24:39 +0000

EPA has, indeed, sunk to new lows under the current administration. Is there ANYONE there at EPA who thinks any CO2-related regulations promulgated on the basis of the “endangerment finding” has ANY chance of making it through the courts? Once the courts learn of the lameness of IPCC’s junkscience, they will laugh Lisa and friends out of the courtroom (I would hope, anyway).

By: hro001

hro001 — Wed, 27 Jan 2010 05:03:51 +0000

Dr. Carlin,

Joseph D’Aleo and Anthony Watts have just released a new paper that I believe goes a considerable way towards supporting your position – and vindicating your “rejected” comments on the TSD.

Title is: SURFACE TEMPERATURE RECORDS: POLICY DRIVEN DECEPTION?

It is published by the SPPI and available directly from their site: http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/images/stories/papers/originals/surface_temp.pdf

Or via the link at WUWT
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/01/26/new-paper-on-surface-temperature-records/

By: hro001

hro001 — Tue, 26 Jan 2010 08:40:41 +0000

Dr. Carlin,

I am neither a scientist nor an economist, just a fellow-traveller in the blogosphere who knows how to read!

It is appalling to see how cavalierly your superiors have dismissed your work – and your concerns (how you managed to put together your very extensive criticism in a mere 4 or 5 days is astounding!). How you manage to continue to work in that environment of self-interested deception is amazing.

As a concerned Canadian, whose government is committed to “harmonizing” our emissions targets with those of your government, I really do wish that one or more of my neighbours to the South would remind The Great Green Hope (and Almighty Stopper of Climate Change) of his Presidential Ascendant Promise:

“[...] Promoting science isn’t just about providing resources (such as $500,000+ of “stimulus” funds to Michael “Hide the Decline” Mann -hro) but protecting free and open enquiry, [ensuring] facts are never overturned by politics and ideology, and listening to what our scientists have to say especially when it’s inconvenient”.

http://hro001.wordpress.com/2009/12/20/apres-la-copenhagen-carbonfest-deluge-a-very-inconvenient-coldspell/