Comments on: Why the Basic Ground-measured Global Temperature Data Presented by AGW Supporters Is Suspect

By: Warcraft

Warcraft — Tue, 17 Aug 2010 18:56:23 +0000

I hope you have a nice day! Very good article, well written and very thought out. I am looking forward to reading more of your posts in the future.

By: Mara Bulgrin

Mara Bulgrin — Thu, 13 May 2010 13:48:39 +0000

This is 1 of the top-quality article post on the blog which My spouse and i have browse through till date on this particular issue. Realistically wide-ranging yet to the point with out virtually any nonsense.

By: Kyle Crissler

Kyle Crissler — Thu, 13 May 2010 11:01:02 +0000

Mind-boggling post, I share the same views. I wonder why this kind of modern world truly does not think like myself and also the web publication master

By: Nikki Gonzalez

Nikki Gonzalez — Thu, 13 May 2010 03:50:12 +0000

Finally a smart blogger…I love how you’re thinking and writing!

By: Carlin Economics and Science » Phil Jones May Still Have Some More Reflecting To Do

Tue, 16 Feb 2010 01:06:49 +0000

[...] temperature changes prior to 1998 may have been due to natural oscillations related to El Nino (see here). This is a one-sided rather than the objective approach that is more likely to lead to good [...]

By: Climategate: Phil Jones Still Has More Reflecting To Do »• for •, >> and » » Conservative Viewpoint Blog

Mon, 15 Feb 2010 17:56:45 +0000

[...] data. This strongly suggests that the global temperature changes prior to 1998 may have been due to natural oscillations related to El Nino. Jones’ approach is one-sided, rather than an objective approach that is more likely to lead to [...]

By: Carlin Economics and Science » Why the Whole AGW/Warmist Narrative Is Even Weaker than Its Components

Fri, 12 Feb 2010 15:50:07 +0000

[...] significant impact of fossil fuel use is likely). There also was some modest warming in 1998, which shows no apparent relation to changes in CO2 levels. Otherwise it is difficult to make the case for [...]

By: FollowFacts

FollowFacts — Wed, 03 Feb 2010 21:27:01 +0000

FYI: The manipulation spreads (NCDC and GISS) —

“Skeptical climate researchers have discovered extensive manipulation of the data within the U.S. Government’s two primary climate centers: the National Climate Data Center (NCDC) in Asheville, North Carolina and the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) at Columbia University in New York City.”

Coleman, John. “Global Warming – The Other Side: now online, all five (actually 7) parts here.” Scientific Blog. Watts Up With That?, January 14, 2010. http://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/01/14/john-colemans-hourlong-news-special-global-warming-the-other-side-now-online-all-five-parts-here/#more-15267

“GIStemp – A Human View « Musings from the Chiefio.” http://chiefio.wordpress.com/2009/11/09/gistemp-a-human-view/

“GIStemp « Musings from the Chiefio.” http://chiefio.wordpress.com/gistemp/

By: More on Bad Temperature Data « The Climate Conspiracy

More on Bad Temperature Data « The Climate Conspiracy — Sat, 09 Jan 2010 17:19:08 +0000

[...] comprehensive one at WUWT, an excellent one at Warwick Hughes, and a very well explained one at Carlin Economics. Tagged as: bad, climate, data, hadcrut3, stations, surface, temperature, uah Leave a comment [...]

By: Arno Arrak

Arno Arrak — Sun, 27 Sep 2009 00:41:27 +0000

I fully agree with your thesis. Glad you found use for my graphs from an earlier version. That version still hypothecates about a cosmogenic origin for the super El Nino which I have abandoned in favor of Indian Ocean overflow. Sorry about that. If I were a politician that would be a flip-flop but in science we abandon a hypothesis when a better one is available. Please download my latest version – it is in two parts now on ICECAP and comes as two PDF files. (It just got too long to post it as one). I have more in it about falsified land temperatures. Arno