Carlin Economics and Science

Applications of economics and science for rational public policy by Alan Carlin
  • rss
  • Home
  • About
  • Publications
    • An Evaluation of U.S. Government Aid to India, June 1964
    • Environmentally Responsible Energy Pricing, 1993
    • The United States Experience with Economic Incentives to Control Environmental Pollution 1992
    • Environmental Investments, The Cost of a Clean Environment, A Summary, 1990
    • Environmental Investments, Cost of a Clean Environment, Report by the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency to the Congress of the United States, 1991
    • Implementation and Utilization of Geoengineering for Global Climate Change Control, 2007
    • Mr. Udall’s Analysis, An Unrepentant Rejoinder
    • Risky Gamble
    • Vehicle Safety, Why the Market Did Not Encourage It and How It Might be Made to Do So, 1968
    • Why a Different Approach Is Required if Global Climate Change Is to Be Controlled Efficiently or Even at All
  • Added Sources

US Supports Costly Loss and Damage Mechanism at UN Doha Climate Meeting

Alan Carlin | December 8, 2012

Although there is little evidence for significant human impacts on climate, there is no credible evidence for human causation of extreme weather events, as I and many others have recently pointed out. Despite this, the US voted at a UN climate meeting in Doha, Qatar this week to establish a loss and damage mechanism under which developed countries would be responsible for losses supposedly resulting from extreme weather events in poor nations. The resolution was approved with the result that this is now an official UN position which would presumably be included in any future international climate agreement. There is reported to be a cap of $100 billion dollars per year on the total of such transfers.

I am not sure that US taxpayers, who might foot a significant portion of these international transfers if the US were to participate in such agreements with this provision, would be overly enthusiastic if they understood what the US and UN voted to approve.

Categories
United Nations
Comments rss
Comments rss
Trackback
Trackback

« EPA’s Proposed Carbon “Pollution” Standard for New Power Plants The Need for Using Geoengineering to Avoid a New Ice Age Starting in the Next Few Millennia »

One Response to “US Supports Costly Loss and Damage Mechanism at UN Doha Climate Meeting”

  1. California Cities Tie Citizens to United Nations Agenda 21—Jobs Will be Lost says:
    April 1, 2013 at 10:06 pm

    [...] the U.N. activists instituted at Qatar a climate “Loss and Damage Mechanism.” This makes the developed nations of the world, including the United States, liable for [...]

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Recent Posts

  • The Need for Using Geoengineering to Avoid a New Ice Age Starting in the Next Few Millennia
  • US Supports Costly Loss and Damage Mechanism at UN Doha Climate Meeting
  • EPA’s Proposed Carbon “Pollution” Standard for New Power Plants
  • Excellent Videos Summarizing the Skeptic Case Available from Down Under
  • Very Interesting New Paper on Astronomical Climatology
  • Why a Copernican Revolution Is Needed in Climate Change Research
  • My Presentation on Climate Change Causation and Geoengineering at Moscow Conference on November 8
  • EPA Inspector General Finds Procedures Used in Preparing GHG Endangerment Finding Did Not Follow OMB Requirements
  • Murry Salby Presents Simple Analysis Showing that Variations in Atmospheric CO2 Are Primarily Due to Natural Temperature Changes, Not Humans
  • Obama’s Multifaceted Global Warming Doctrine Agenda and What Might Be Done to Slow It Down

Search

Archive

Recent Comments

  • California Cities Tie Citizens to United Nations Agenda 21—Jobs Will be Lost on US Supports Costly Loss and Damage Mechanism at UN Doha Climate Meeting
  • James Stafford on About
  • Brian H on The Need for Using Geoengineering to Avoid a New Ice Age Starting in the Next Few Millennia
rss Comments rss valid xhtml 1.1 design by jide powered by Wordpress get firefox