We see that in every single instance of comparison, the Theory of the Greenhouse Effect appears to contradict what the Laws of Thermodynamics have to say about the exact same physical situation.

The conclusion of this article is very simple: there is no such thing as a radiative Theory of the Greenhouse Effect, not in real greenhouses, and certainly not in any planetary atmosphere known to man. The true role of the atmosphere, on Earth, is that it cools the ground, not warms it. Therefore, there is no such thing as Anthropogenic Global Warming or anthropogenic-CO2 induced climate change, because that supposition is based on the false Theory of the Greenhouse Effect.

Please see http://www.oarval.org/ThermoAtmos.htm

From your own experience in the EPA and from the other skeptic scientists I speak about, the most basic problem of all becomes ever more apparent: People who seemingly do everything they can to promote the idea of man-caused global warming also seem to take extreme efforts to marginalize their critics – silence them, by default – rather than squarely face those critics and show us all what is wrong with the criticisms. This prompts an obvious question – do they have no confidence in the underlying science supporting the idea of man-caused global warming?

I am looking forward to reading the article in some depth as the abstract caught my attention- esp “The costs of CO2 emissions reductions are very much higher than usually estimated because of technological and implementation problems recently identified.”