Comments on: Comments on Proposed EPA Endangerment Technical Support Document

By: Jesus Arentz

Jesus Arentz — Sat, 24 Jul 2010 19:56:46 +0000

Thank you for this page. Thats all I can say. You most definitely have made this blog into something speciel. You clearly know what you are doing, youve covered so many corners.kind regards

By: Clayton Pelow

Clayton Pelow — Fri, 23 Jul 2010 02:41:01 +0000

This is absolutely one of the most fascinating blogs I have seen. It’s so painless to tune out, but there’s seriously some supreme information online, and I believe your blog is one of the few!

By: Buzz

Buzz — Sun, 04 Jul 2010 13:30:53 +0000

my primary concern is increasing acidification of the oceans, which is quite well documented. Early predictions that the oceans would be a “sink” for carbon dioxide via conversion into carbonates are not holding true, I suspect because no one foresaw the rise of Chinese industrialization and its concomitant coal consumption.

By: Carlin Economics and Science » Why the Whole AGW/Warmist Narrative Is Even Weaker than Its Components

Fri, 11 Jun 2010 16:16:00 +0000

[...] the assumptions used in constructing them rather than having any actual predictive power (see Section 1.7 of my Comments). If this first assumption is incorrect the later assumptions should make little difference since [...]

By: Sigrid Tirpak

Sigrid Tirpak — Tue, 08 Jun 2010 03:55:58 +0000

This post makes a lot of sense !

By: Gail Combs

Gail Combs — Mon, 07 Jun 2010 11:52:49 +0000

A quick note. There is a debate on human made CO2 over at WUWT today you might wish to comment on.

[http://] wattsupwiththat.com/2010/06/07/some-people-claim-that-theres-a-human-to-blame/

By: Gail Combs

Gail Combs — Mon, 07 Jun 2010 10:40:41 +0000

I would like to thank Alan Carlin, Fred H. Haynie, former Oregon State Climatologist George Taylor, Miskolczi, former NASA physicist whose publication of his paper was blocked by NASA and who resigned in protest and the other scientists who have fought muzzling by the establishment. Global Warming is just a means used to gain more money and power.

The EPA and NASA are not the only gov’t bureaucracies guilty of this. Check out John Munsell, Stan Painter, USDA and the Congressional investigations in food contamination caused by the new “international” HACCP standards. Nicole Johnson has a couple of well investigated articles on the issue.

Union Chairman, Stan Painter was placed on disciplinary status while the USDA pursued criminal charges when he refused to name the USDA inspectors who complained about the new HACCP regulations allowing contaminated food to be sold to consumers. Thanks to FOI requests, from ‘Public Citizen’ and Japan, Over 1000 non-compliance reports – weighing some 16 pounds — were turned over.

Fom one of the hearings:

Answer. …. The FSIS investigation has been completed and the allegations concerning improper enforcement of SRM regulations were not substantiated. In addition, the OIG independently sent an investigator and an audit team to examine the allegations concerning SRM regulatory compliance. Their observations also concluded that the chairman’s allegations were unsubstantiated.

Yet there were about 25 contaminated meat recalls in one year alone!

Kissinger stated: “Control oil and you control nations; control food and you control the people; control money and you control the world”

Control oil => Global Warming and Carbon trading

Control food => World Trade Organization’s Agreement on Agriculture

Control money => Obama’s sign off on the “Financial Stability Board” An International Economic Union that would control all financial institutions around the globe. “…it’s a whole new world of financial regulation in which, essentially, all of the U.S. regulatory bodies and all U.S. companies are put under international regulation, international supervision. It really amounts to a global economic governance.”

Two out of three and “they” almost have the last leg implemented. Welcome to the new World Neo-feudal State, where democracy no longer applies.

The FDA has already stated:
“The harmonization of laws, regulations and standards between and among trading partners requires intense, complex, time-consuming negotiations by CFSAN officials. Harmonization must simultaneously facilitate international trade and promote mutual understanding, while protecting national interests and establish a basis to resolve food issues on sound scientific evidence in an objective atmosphere. Failure to reach a consistent, harmonized set of laws, regulations and standards within the freetrade agreements and the World Trade Organization Agreements can result in considerable economic repercussions.”

And those of you who thought our laws were written by Congress, think again

By: Setsuko Wilen

Setsuko Wilen — Sun, 06 Jun 2010 12:26:54 +0000

Howdy, your site is on air in the radio! Good job mate. Your posts are truly great and bookmarked. Regards

By: Na Zdrowie

Na Zdrowie — Tue, 01 Jun 2010 09:00:16 +0000

I just book marked your blog on Digg and StumbleUpon.I enjoy reading your commentaries.

By: Carlin Economics and Science » Phil Jones May Still Have Some More Reflecting To Do

Sat, 29 May 2010 14:24:25 +0000

[...] effects of solar variability (such as the Svensmark hypothesis) as discussed in Section 2.5 of my Comments and the effects of oceanic climate oscillations (such as the Pacific Decadal Oscillation) discussed [...]